Gotta say, I still don’t understand what just happened.
There were increasing complaints from the public every month since federal law on medical marijuana changed last April and marijuana dispensaries suddenly bloomed like a thousand flowers in Vancouver. City types kept saying there was nothing they could do because the federal law had created a gray area.
But today, it appears there is something they can do. To wit: charge dispensaries $30,000 for a permit, make them get a business licence and a development permit, tell them they can’t be within 300 metres of a school, community centre, neighbourhood house or other marijuana business, forbid them from selling edible marijuana stuff, and more.
The city report is here. Next week, council will vote on whether to send it to a public hearing. No speakers allowed at that decision point, folks, but you can all line up for the public hearing, which I suspect will be scheduled faster than a Wall Development rezoning.
In the meantime, great fun to be had getting the kinds of quotes one can only get in Vancouver about this kind of thing. My favourite, to date, from Kerry Jang in my Globe story: “We have more of these shops than Tim Hortons.” I haven’t had a chance to check other people’s stuff yet, but I bet it’s rich.
6 responses so far ↓
1 Salvaich // Apr 23, 2015 at 11:26 am
Better real regulation than token regulation.
-30-
2 peakie // Apr 23, 2015 at 1:04 pm
Hmm. Broken link to City report.
http://www.francesbula.com/ormer.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20150428/documents/rr1.pdf
Though that is obviously http://former etc.
I see that Chad Skelton, of the Vancouver Sun has already done a quick map of which are ‘too close’ (300 m.) to schools.
I know of one of his too-close-to-schools is also next to a brothel and across street from a new converted hotel for the homeless (often addicted) and “too close” to a MacDonalds!
The only medical references are in the
No credits for the various cut-and-pastes from various officials, or did Dr. Ballem write everything herself?
I would have like to see some reviews (12821 references easily found on PubMed) for both the cannaboids (the chemical) and marijuana (the plant) and effects. There are 1482 ‘reviews’ and 27 Cochrane reviews.
This is dangerous stuff, with consequences.
No mention was made of the Denver study that thousands of “homeless” moved to Colorado because the drug was “cheaper and available” for the poor.
3 Internet made me obsolete // Apr 23, 2015 at 2:40 pm
“Token regulation”. Heehee.
4 Lysenko's Nemesis // Apr 27, 2015 at 9:21 pm
He smiled and coughed, in muffled way.
And now, Vancouver goes higher. The Parks Board approves a zip-line in Queen Elizabeth Park. It’s business. But they rejected an elegant tower.
https://pricetags.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/henriquezs-tower/
5 Norman12 // Apr 28, 2015 at 8:44 am
I have to wonder how these shops are financed and where they get their product. I hear that street-level pot dealing has pretty well disappeared because it’s more convenient to get a “prescription” (some of these stores require none) and start shopping. What a gift to the boys on motorcycles.
6 peakie // May 26, 2015 at 3:53 pm
Mayor’s pot plan: License the `good actors,’ crack down on violators
By Evan Bush Seattle Times staff reporter
http://old.seattletimes.com/text/2026388726.html
Tuesday, May 26, 2015 – Page updated at 03:30 p.m.
Mayor Ed Murray will propose legislation this afternoon that could shut down more than 50 medical-marijuana dispensaries and give the city a tighter grip on the rest of Seattle’s pot industry.
….The mayor’s plan follows state lawmakers’ effort to fold medical marijuana into the state’s recreational system. The new state law, approved last month, calls for the Liquor Control Board (which will be renamed the Liquor and Cannabis Board) to assess the merit of medical-marijuana businesses and license those that qualify by July 2016.
“Some stores are selling without medical authorizations,” said Mendoza. “We’re building cases against them.”
The city also listed second- and third-tier considerations that risk enforcement. Those include medical-marijuana delivery, violations of city fire and building codes, allowing on-site pot consumption, not testing marijuana sold to patients and being located within 1,000 feet (300 m.) of a school or playground or within 500 feet (150 m.) of another marijuana store or dispensary.
Businesses can appeal violations assessed by the city and contest suspensions or revocations of their license. [7]The Office of the Hearing Examiner, an independent body, will handle those cases.
The mayor’s office estimates the legislation will cost more than $800,000 to implement, not including costs to the city’s law department or Seattle Fire Department…..
No mention that there is no clinical evidence for
“medical marijuana” in studies and reviews.