I’ve been accused before of judging the city on the basis of looks, rather than function. This is another example.
But how the city looks sometimes does have a bearing on how it functions. How it looks is the physical representation of us, the people who live here, and what we value, who we are now and what we have been since we’ve inhabited this land where the city now exists.
And so, you might think, with that opening, I would be writing about how I can hardly wait for the viaducts to come down, for the beautiful park to appear and the new festival wharf, the artistic new seawall, the new, beautifully landscaped streets that don’t go past chain link fences and rusting hulks of something and parking lots, as Expo and Pacific boulevards do now.
I’m sure it will all be spectacular. I’ll come to appreciate it. The Olympic Village, across the way, with its bridges, parks, and little island, is now one of my favourite parts of the city. I understand the logic behind the recommendations and also the opportunities.
But I will miss the viaducts.
I’ll miss them because they’re grubby and unattractive and originally built to go over the rail tracks that ran through False Creek. I’ll miss them because they give Vancouver the feel of a working city, one that’s not all about being shiny and perfect so that the tourists will visit and more people will want to buy condos here.
Former city planner Larry Beasley called them Vancouver’s “little piece of Los Angeles” when he was at city hall. And he didn’t mean Santa Monica or Silver Lake.
But I like that little piece of Los Angeles, with its stubborn refusal to fit in at all with the lovely, bland real-estate-ad-renders (towers, park, seawall, blue skies, mountains) we are currently seeing as the viaducts proposal is discussed.
It’s not that I want no change or don’t like shiny new things. I sure do. But, like many longtime Vancouverites (here since ’63), the constant replacement of the old, shabby, quirky town with generic new neighbourhoods is sometimes just a little too much cough medicine to swallow at once.
And, selfishly, I’ll miss that little aerial view from the viaducts, that sense of flying over the city and seeing it a different way, just for a couple of minutes before you return to ground level and are swallowed up.
53 responses so far ↓
1 jenables // Oct 30, 2015 at 11:17 pm
It is mandated, that is sustainable development. Mixed use costs more to build and carries a higher liability – every empty storefront you see is a liability of sorts. When you talk about Paris, I’m going to assume you are referring to the demolition led by Baron Haussman under Napoleon III. I’m not sure the two are comparable. On the one hand, you have essentially a medieval city in the industrial age. Cramped, dark, and filthy, without a decent sewer or water delivery system. A breeding ground for disease. Streets five metres wide. It was then replaced by buildings which are still standing today, but I find it very hard to believe what is being built in Vancouver today will last fifty years, let alone a hundred and fifty. I also think there is such a thing as classic beauty, or timeless visual appeal that older buildings have- I don’t see too many new buildings that embody this, which is not to say it’s not possible. These new buildings quite literally all look like they are part of a new business park created on former swampland, or something. Just really, really bland. So funny, just now I was trying to put into words what it is that makes them that way when I realised there is often a total lack of curves or arches (not to mention all the mouldings, alcoves, beautiful floors and other details that make older buildings special) in buildings today. I wonder if that’s it, and why it matters, aesthetically.
2 Roger_Kemble // Oct 31, 2015 at 9:41 am
http://www.theyorkshirelad.ca/towers/towers.html
3 VancouverMan // Oct 31, 2015 at 6:31 pm
Hi Frances. that is a beautiful sentiment. Industrial Vancouver – what a concept – in al it’s un-green marketability. There is no way we will ever be the greenest city – any poverty stricken city of a million people in India will be greener than us. (Maybe we could be the healthiest city in the world by 2020 as health incorporates both wealth and the environment). I hope a remnant of the viaducts will remain at the foot of Dunsmuir and that it will be a public plaza not swallowed up by GM Place crowds.